--Barry Asmus
The Required Disclosures
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
ADP Employment Report
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Jobs And Mortgages
- The government and non-profit sector led the charge, with 6450 planned reductions in staff (up substantially from December's 3276 job cuts). Furthermore, there are no indications that there will be a turnaround in the trend in 2011.
- The retail sector was second with an announcement to cut 5755 jobs. this is also up from December's 4937, but significantly down from January 2010 (16,737 layoffs). Challenger, Gray & Christmas see this as a sign of a rebound in the retail sector.
- California had the most layoffs (4848), followed by Illinois (4078), North Carolina (3465), Michigan (2604) and Iowa 92216).
- Employment in the service sector rose by 166,000 (the twelfth consecutive month of gains for the sector), while the employment in the goods-producing sector rose 21,000 (the third month of consecutive gains) and employment in the manufacturing sector rose 19,000 (also the third consecutive month of gains).
- Construction employment fell 1000. Financial services employment gained 3000.
- Large business employment increased by 11,000. Medium-size business employment increased 79,000. Small-size business employment increased 97,000.
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
ADP: Employment Is Good. (Also, Other Metrics)
- Service sector jobs increased by 270,000[2], the single largest monthly increase in the history of the report. Financial services, a subset of this sector, shed 8000 jobs.
- Goods-producing sector jobs rose 27,000. As a subset of this, manufacturing sector jobs increased 23,000 and construction sector jobs remained unchanged (meaning they didn't drop for the first time since June 2007)
- The greatest gains came from medium businesses, which hired 144,000 new employees. Small businesses hired 117,000, and large businesses hired 36,000.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
The First Half Of The Measures
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. is, according to their web site, "one of the world's largest providers of business outsourcing solutions." They provide "...HR, payroll, tax and benefits administration solutions." This puts them in a good place to examine the employment situation, because they're providing payroll services to some 550,000 clients. Their report doesn't carry the same weight as the BLS Employment Situation report, but it still provides a good look at what nonfarm private sector employment looks like.
Their report can be read at http://www.adpemploymentreport.com/, which shows that private sector employment rose by 93,000 in November. That's up from a (revised) 82,000 increase in October, and represents the 10th consecutive month of gains (with an average of 47,000 new jobs per month). They do not, however, expect this to be enough gains to lower the unemployment rate. Their prediction is that unemployment will remain above 9% through 2011. 79,000 of the new jobs came from the service sector and 14,000 came from the goods-producing sector. Small businesses saw an increase of 54,000 jobs, medium-size businesses saw an increase of 37,000, and large businesses saw a 2000 increase.
Moving on to productivity and costs, this measures the Q/Q change in nonfarm productivity and in unit labor costs. The information is compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Street likes it because they like seeing the companies they invest in maximizing production while minimizing costs (because that means maximizing profits). This month, we get the Q3 2010 revised estimates.
The initial data (released in September) indicated that nonfarm productivity had increased by 1.9% and unit labor costs were down 0.1%. Looking to the final revision, analysts were looking to see a nonfarm productivity revised to up 2.0% and unit labor costs revised to a net change of 0.0%.
The report is available at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/prod2.pdf. Nonfarm productivity was revised to a 2.3% increase, with unit labor costs down 0.1%. Not too shabby. Pretty much in line with expectations.
See you in about half an hour or so with the ISM Manufacturing Index and Constructions Spending.