"Economists are pessimists: they've predicted 8 of the last 3 depressions."
--Barry Asmus

The Required Disclosures

The information presented in this blog and its individual articles is provided for informational use only and should not be considered investment advice or an offer for a particular security. The contents reflect the views and opinions of the individual writer as of the date the article was written and do not necessarily represent the views of the individual writer on the current date. They also do not in any way, shape, or form represent the views of the Firm Never-To-Be-Named. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and The Great Redoubt and its individual writers disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views should not be relied on as investment advice, and because investment decisions for any security are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any contributor to The Great Redoubt. Neither The Great Redoubt nor any individual author can be held responsible for any direct or incidental loss incurred by applying any of the information offered. Please consult your tax or financial advisor for additional information concerning your specific situation.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

ADP Employment Report

Waiting for Friday's Employment Situation is kind of like waiting for Christmas when you're young.  The days drag out endlessly and you dream of what that special day will bring.  And then, when the day arrives, you rush to open your presents and sometimes you get exactly what you asked Santa for.
 
And sometimes you get an itchy and ill-fitting sweater.
 
The ADP Employment Report is an advent calendar window to the Employment Situation's Christmas.  It's a little teaser, that both soothes and stimulates the anticipation.  In March, that teasing bit of anticipation came in the form of 201,000 new private-sector non-farm jobs, 75.57% of which came from the service sector and 50.7% of which came from small businesses.
 
The April report is just not as happy.  The March employment figures were revised upwards to 207,000 new jobs (which is good), but April is only showing an additional 179,000 jobs.  77.09% of those jobs came from the service-providing sector, while 22.91% came from the goods-providing sector.  This marks the 16th consecutive month of employment gains for the service-providing sector and the 6th consecutive monthly gain for the goods providing sector.
 
6.14% of the new jobs came from large businesses, 46.92% came from medium-size businesses, and the remaining 49.94% came from small businesses[1].
 
[1]  Definitions:  A large business has 500+ workers.  A medium-size business has 50-499 workers, and a small business has less than 50 workers.

The Challenger Job Cut Report

It's only Wednesday, but we're starting to get some employment data crawling out of the woodwork in preparation for Friday's Employment Situation report.
 
The Challenger Job Cuts report is issued by the outplacement consulting firm Challenger, Gray, and Christmas[1], which works with companies that are laying off employees to assist those employees in finding new jobs.  As a result, they have a lot of insight into current plans to cut jobs, and use that data to release a report about layoff trends.
 
One thing you have to keep in mind about the report.  The job cut figures do not represent layoffs for the month.  Instead, they represent layoffs announced during the month, even if the actual job losses will be in future months.  (That is, if a firm announces in March that it will lay off 30 workers by the end of August, the Challenger report puts that in the March figures instead of the August figures.)
 
The report for March was mixed.  They calculated that employers would cut 41,528 jobs, mostly in the public sector (46%, in fact), which brought the Q1 job cut total to 130,749 - which was the lowest Q1 layoff total since 1995.
 
That's nice and all, but how is April looking?  Well, according to the report, April is looking pretty good.  Employers announced plans to cut 36,490 jobs from their payrolls during the month, bringing the year to date layoff figures to 167,239.  I bring that little factoid up because the report indicates that hiring is on the rise;  year to date, employers have announced plans to add 172,590 new workers - 59,648 in April alone.
 
On the down side with those hiring figures, 50,000 of the 59,648 new hires announced in April were from McDonalds.  And while yes, a job at McDonalds is a paying job, it's not usually considered to be a job with good pay, benefits, or long-term prospects.
 
On the up side, John Challenger (CEO of Challenger, Gray & Christmas) notes that "It is important to realize that our hiring figures represent just a fraction of the job creation that is actually occurring, since most employers do not publicly announce hiring intentions."
 
29.4% of the planned job cuts are government and/or non-profit jobs.  The next largest number of planned layoffs come from the aerospace & defense industry, at 12.37%.  The top reasons for job cuts are cost-cutting (24.94%), business closing (24.73%), and restructuring (20.1%).
 
[1]  Their corporate motto is not "It's Christmas!  You're getting laid off![2]"  But it's fun to pretend that it is.
[2]  Actually, I think that current corporate speak would actually state this as "It's Christmas!  You've been granted the opportunity to participate in a rightsizing opportunity!".

MBA Weekly Applications Survey

If you recall from last week, the Mortgage Bankers Association didn't have a lot of good news.  They reported a 5.6% decline in the Market Composite Index for the week ending 4/22, driven by a mild decline in refinancing (0.6%) and a steep decline in first time applications (13.6%).  Most of the decline was laid at the feet of the FHA, which recently increased premiums.  The average contract interest rate for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage slipped to 4.80%.
 
Things substantially improved for the week ending 4/29.  The Market Composite Index increased 4.0%, with the Refinance Index increasing 6.0% and the Purchase Index increasing 0.3%.  Refinancing accounted for 62.7% of total applications (up 110 bps from last week) and adjustable-rate mortgages accounted for 6.7% of mortgage activity (up 20 bps).  And the average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages?  That fell to 4.75%.

Monday, May 2, 2011

World News

Osama Bin Laden
(Yes, I'm perfectly aware that he isn't a country.  But he is the single biggest news item today.)
  • Old news at this point, but Osama Bin Laden was killed in a a gun battle with US forces in his three-story resort fortress 35 miles north of Islamabad.  One of his adult sons, two other men, and an unidentified woman were also killed in the fight.
  • The reaction of the Islamic to the news of Bin Laden's death has been mixed.  The Palestinian Authority has called his death "good for the cause of peace", Hamas is calling it "the assassination and the killing of an Arab holy warrior," and Human Rights Watch is saying "Bin Laden Is just a bad memory.  The Region has moved way beyond that, with massive broad-based upheavals that are game-changers."  These may be taken as typical of the responses:  "yay!", "boo!", or "so what?"
  • Osama Bin Laden was been buried at sea[1] at 2 AM EST.  Reports from the US Department of Defense are that "The deceased's body was washed and then placed in a white sheet. The body was placed in a weighted bag. a military officer read prepared religious remarks which were translated into Arabic by a native speaker. After the words were complete, the body was place on a prepared flat board, tipped up, whereupon the deceased's body eased into the sea,"
  • Secretary of State Clinton took the opportunity of Osama Bin Laden's death to declare to the Taliban that "you cannot wait us out, you cannot defeat us but you can make the choice to abandon al Qaeda and participate in a peaceful political process."
Afghanistan
  • The Taliban has announced the start of its spring offensive by warning civilians to stay away from public gatherings, military bases, government buildings and convoys, and stating that it will target foreign troops, Afghan security forces, and Afghan officials.
China
Iran
India
Israel
Japan
  • Japan's parliament has passed a 4 trillion yen (that's about $49 billion) emergency budget to help fund reconstruction and support businesses.
Libya
North Korea
United States
 
[1]  I guess that sounds better than "the US military tossed Bin Laden's body overboard".

Report on Foreign Holdings of U.S. Securities at End - June 2010


The final results from the survey of foreign portfolio holdings of U.S. securities at end-June 2010 are released today on the U.S. Treasury web site at (http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/tic/Pages/fpis.aspx).  A revised table on Major Foreign Holders of Treasury Securities, where estimates through end-February 2011 are based in part on survey data, is also released at (http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/tic/Documents/mfh.txt ). 

This annual survey was undertaken jointly by the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.  The next survey will be for end-June 2011 and preliminary data are expected to be released by February 28, 2012.   

Complementary surveys measuring U.S. holdings of foreign securities are also carried out annually.  Data from the most recent survey, reporting on securities held on year-end 2010, are currently being processed.  Preliminary results are expected to be reported by August 31, 2011.

Overall Results

The survey measured foreign holdings of U.S. securities as of June 30, 2010, to be $10,691 billion, with $2,814 billion held in U.S. equities, $6,921 billion in U.S. long-term debt securities1 (of which $1,159 billion are holdings of asset-backed securities (ABS) 2 and $5,763 billion are holdings of non-ABS securities), and $956 billion held in U.S. short-term debt securities.  The previous survey, conducted as of June 30, 2009, measured total foreign holdings of U.S. securities at $9,641 billion, with holdings of $2,252 billion in U.S. equities, $6,240 billion in U.S. long-term debt securities, and $1,149 billion in U.S. short-term debt securities (see Table 1). 

1.  Long-term debt securities have an original term-to-maturity of over one year.
2.  Asset-backed securities are backed by pools of assets, such as pools of residential home mortgages or credit card receivables, which give the security owners claims against the cash flows generated by the underlying assets.  Unlike most other debt securities, these securities generally repay both principal and interest on a regular basis, reducing the principal outstanding with each payment cycle.



Table 1.  Foreign holdings of U.S. securities, by type of security, as of recent survey dates
(Billions of dollars)


Type of Security

         June 30, 2009

         June 30, 2010

Long-term Securities

8,492

9,736

       Equity

2,252

2,814

       Long-term debt

6,240

6,921

              Asset-backed

1,260

1,159

              Other

4,979

5,763

Short-term debt securities

1,149

956

Total

9,641

10,691

Of which: Official

3,880

4,346

Table 2.  Foreign holdings of U.S. securities, by country and type of security, for the major investing countries into the U.S., as of June 30, 2010
(Billions of dollars)

Country or category

Total

Equities

          Long-term debt

Short-term

ABS

Other

debt

1

China (Mainland)1

1,611

127

299

1,180

5

2

Japan

1,393

224

121

979

69

3

United Kingdom

798

324

48

404

22

4

Cayman Islands

743

290

122

249

82

5

Luxembourg

622

172

45

323

82

6

Canada

424

298

9

105

12

7

Belgium

408

19

42

341

6

8

Switzerland

397

162

22

189

25

9

Ireland

356

77

62

118

99

10

Middle East Oil Exporters2

350

128

17

132

73

11

Hong Kong

293

33

84

88

88

12

Bermuda

249

44

48

129

28

13

Netherlands

247

152

22

67

5

14

Taiwan

228

12

32

181

3

15

Germany

195

57

38

92

8

16

France

194

115

19

50

10

17

Singapore

176

91

4

73

8

18

Russia

170

*

*

122

48

19

Brazil

169

2

*

135

33

20

Norway

136

90

13

32

1

21

Korea, South

122

13

35

68

6

22

Australia

118

74

4

34

6

23

British Virgin Islands

85

42

3

24

16

24

Mexico

84

17

2

60

5

25

Sweden

81

49

1

26

5

  

Country Unknown

138

1

*

135

2

Rest of the World

904

201

67

427

209

Total

10,691

2,814

1,159

5,763

956

of which: Foreign Official

4,346

426

466

2,970

484

*   Greater than zero but less than $500 million.
1.  Excludes Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, which are reported separately.
2.  Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates.


U.S. Department of the Treasury Logo Questions? Contact Us

Sometimes, The Marketplace is a Pack of Jackals

By now, you've probably seen the headlines and heart the news that Osama Bin Laden is dead. He was apparently found in a summer resort town about 35 miles north of Islamabad, in what is being described as a "million dollar compound"[1].

"Justice has been done," the President said about Bin Laden's death. You can probably debate whether or not killing a man in a 40 minute shootout is justice, but it's not as if things would have been any different had he been brought back to the United States to stand trial. I suspect that an unbiased jury of his peers would have been hard to come by. But I guess that we could have at least paraded him in chains in a triumphal procession, for the amusement of the mob.

But, and here is where I find it a little embarrassing to be in the securities industry, here is one of the first headlines I saw when I went to Reuters: "Stock futures gain after U.S. kills bin Laden". The dollar is up, crude oil is down, stocks are up, all on the death of one man.

Not the destruction of Al Quaeda. Not genuine victory in Afghanistan or Iraq. Not an end to terrorism conducted by religious fanatics.

The death of one man.

Hooray.

[1] Incidentally, why are they always called "compounds"? Why not "villas", or "estates"? I mean, Camp David doesn't get called a compound.