By now, you've probably seen the headlines and heart the news that Osama Bin Laden is dead. He was apparently found in a summer resort town about 35 miles north of Islamabad, in what is being described as a "million dollar compound"[1].
"Justice has been done," the President said about Bin Laden's death. You can probably debate whether or not killing a man in a 40 minute shootout is justice, but it's not as if things would have been any different had he been brought back to the United States to stand trial. I suspect that an unbiased jury of his peers would have been hard to come by. But I guess that we could have at least paraded him in chains in a triumphal procession, for the amusement of the mob.
But, and here is where I find it a little embarrassing to be in the securities industry, here is one of the first headlines I saw when I went to Reuters: "Stock futures gain after U.S. kills bin Laden". The dollar is up, crude oil is down, stocks are up, all on the death of one man.
Not the destruction of Al Quaeda. Not genuine victory in Afghanistan or Iraq. Not an end to terrorism conducted by religious fanatics.
The death of one man.
Hooray.
[1] Incidentally, why are they always called "compounds"? Why not "villas", or "estates"? I mean, Camp David doesn't get called a compound.
"Economists are pessimists: they've predicted 8 of the last 3 depressions."
--Barry Asmus
--Barry Asmus
The Required Disclosures
The information presented in this blog and its individual articles is provided for informational use only and should not be considered investment advice or an offer for a particular security. The contents reflect the views and opinions of the individual writer as of the date the article was written and do not necessarily represent the views of the individual writer on the current date. They also do not in any way, shape, or form represent the views of the Firm Never-To-Be-Named. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and The Great Redoubt and its individual writers disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views should not be relied on as investment advice, and because investment decisions for any security are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any contributor to The Great Redoubt. Neither The Great Redoubt nor any individual author can be held responsible for any direct or incidental loss incurred by applying any of the information offered. Please consult your tax or financial advisor for additional information concerning your specific situation.
Showing posts with label why is the market up. Show all posts
Showing posts with label why is the market up. Show all posts
Monday, May 2, 2011
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
And Now, By Popular Demand, Why Is The Market Up?
A few factors seem to be contributing. First and foremost, everyone seems to have liked the ISM Manufacturing Index report, with its happy-fun heart-warming "every part of this report is showing positive numbers" results. That, and nobody seems to care about construction spending.
On top of that, we're starting to see signs that Egypt will not dissolve into a round of civil war and mass murder. Egyptian President[1] Hosni Mubarak announced in a speech that he will step down at the next election, which everyone (including himself) hopes will calm the civil unrest. Whether he follows through remains to be seen.[2]
A few other things. Pfizer beat expectations for revenue and, since they're both up substantially and part of the Dow, that has a positive boost on the market. UPS also beat expectations, as did Baidu. British Petroleum announced that they lost a bucket of money[3] last year, to nobody's surprise, so that didn't really hurt them at all.
[1] This is an... interesting title he has. He became President in 1981, after Egyptian President Anwar Sadat was assassinated by Egyptian army officers. President sort of implies elections. Elections are not really something President Mubarak has had to suffer through. Technically, he had to stand for election in 1987, 1993, 1999, and 2005. The first three of those, however, were handled by referendums put forward and voted on by an Egyptian parliament that is typically described as a "rubber stamp" - no other candidates need apply. The 2005 election was the first Western-style election he ever faced, where he won reelection thanks to the support of unregistered and/or dead voters. The distinction here between "President" and "brutal dictator" seems to be "does the United States see you as an ally".
[2] Pro tip: He probably won't. Unless he does so from the airport, with the nation's supply of gold bullion safely spirited away.
[3] A 190,120,055 gallon bucket, at that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)